DSUP · § 15

Open decisions

Six parameters not yet frozen, from the tun weight cap to what counts as activity-pool participation, published rather than quietly decided.

  1. Tun cap at 2.0× or 3.0×? — 2.0× keeps new entrants viable; 3.0× locks the float harder but closes the collection to anyone who did not mint. Leaning 2.0× for v1, revisit with data.
  2. Weekly or daily epochs? — Weekly is legible and cheap; daily feels alive but multiplies gas and makes each drop feel like nothing.
  3. $DSUP transfer fee at launch, or keep the token clean? — Vault plus royalty may be enough revenue on its own.
  4. Seed basket: 8 tickers or narrow to 4? — Fewer tickers means stronger trait identity and a more legible rarity table.
  5. Does REHYDRATING accrue at 0× or base 1.0×? — Leaning 0×; it is the cleanest defense against drop-sniping and the 48 hours is already a real cost.
  6. Activity pool eligibility definition — which exact actions count as "participated this epoch"? Too narrow and it is farmable by wash trading; too broad and it is not really activity.

These six are published unresolved on purpose, not as a placeholder — freezing weight math and split percentages before mint per §11 means decisions 1, 2, and 5 specifically need to be closed before the distributor is frozen, not after. Decision 6 is the hardest of the six: the activity pool in §5 is only self-regulating if "participated" tracks genuine activity rather than a definition that can be farmed by wash-trading between two wallets one holder controls, and no eligibility rule proposed so far has fully closed that without also excluding legitimate low-frequency traders.

DSUP is an experimental on-chain protocol. Distributions are rewards-program airdrops funded by protocol fee revenue — not corporate dividends, equity ownership, or shareholder rights. Token-bound account contents are controlled by the specimen owner and may be withdrawn or lose value at any time. Nothing here is financial advice.